Fairness in Women’s Sports
--
Should transgender athletes compete in sports meant for biological women? This article discusses the newly approved “Fairness in Women’s Sports” Act, and not only how people are currently reacting to the bill, but opinions that were in circulation about transgender athletes that would participate in the(at the time) upcoming 2020 Olympics.
Firstly, some background; on Wednesday, April 14th, 2021, the “Fairness in Women’s Sports” Act was passed, 70–44. This bill, in the simplest of terms, would allow schools at a K-12 range to check students biological sex, and ban them from women’s sports. People have come up with many different statements in response to this bill; this will allow schools to molest children, this is discriminatory towards transgender youth, discriminatory towards transgender people in general, this is simply the stepping stone to “Nazi America”.
On the other hand, some people also recognize that this bill is trying to protect women’s sports from those with an “unfair biological advantage”.
Sources (in order of appearance)-
@iicf_backhome. “Tw // Transphobia , Sexual Assault — -a Thread on What’s Happening in Florida Because It’s Terrifying and No One Is Talking about It.” Twitter, Twitter, 18 Apr. 2021, twitter.com/iicf_backhome/status/1383689578146525193.
Credibility- 1/10
-Although it does discuss the bill, it takes all points of the bill and blows it out of proportion in order to cause panic and hysteria.
-Does not include any sources, does not discuss or quote relevant politicians or news stories.
“Are the Rules for Trans Athletes Fair?” YouTube, The Economist, 26 Dec. 2019, www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrgJQI3O_RQ.
Credibility- 9/10
-Includes the point of view from both sides of the argument.
-Includes multiple different sources, that the viewer can find easily.
-Took off one credibility point since they did not link sources in the description of the video, simply stated the names in the video itself.
Hardy, Omari J. “We Gave Everything We Had to Give…” Twitter, Twitter, 15 Apr. 2021, twitter.com/OmariJHardy/status/1382521994554572804.
Credibility- 5/10
-The author, Omari Hardy, is an actual politician that worked with this bill (not in its creation, simply the voting process) and got some credibility points for that.
-He doesn’t exactly claim that transgender or other children would be molested, but allows his followers to assume it through his use of words “subjecting kids whose sex may be disputed to genital inspections”.
Alexis. “So Just so I’m Understanding This Correctly…” Twitter, @Heyyitsalexx, 15 Apr. 2021, twitter.com/heyyitsalexx/status/1382649452935196678.
Credibility- 0/10
-Completely exaggerates the effects of the bill.
-No sources, and in fact takes the words of the bill and twists them to suggest mass molestation in schools.
-Can be disproven by one source, which is the bill itself.
Https://Www.flsenate.gov/, 2021, p. 2–3. www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2021/1475/BillText/c1/PDF.
Credibility- 10/10
-It is the source itself, published on the official website for the Senate/House of Representatives.
“Transgender Athletes Are DESTROYING Women’s Sports | RT Topics [Corrected Version].” YouTube, RussiaToday, 24 Sept. 2019, www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJe82yniZQo.
Credibility- 9/10
-Includes the point of view from both sides of the argument.
-Includes multiple different sources, that the viewer can find easily.
-Similarly to the first video, I took off one credibility point since they did not link sources in the description of the video, simply stated the names in the video itself.
-Includes multiple scientific sources for the biology involved.